Skip to main content

A lighthouse for STEM teacher education and training in Europe

Policy and Research

Policy Briefs

Policy Brief 1: Implementing European Priorities into Practice

Findings:

  1. STEM is understood and defined as four separate disciplines in almost all partner countries.
  2. The majority of partner countries do not have a formal STEM curriculum.
  3. Partner countries have serious STEM action plans, but none of them have a dedicated STEM education policy.
  4. None of the countries has STEM teachers, all countries have teachers of different STEM disciplines.
  5. Policies regarding the training of the in-service teachers vary across the
    partner countries.
  6. Most of the partner countries prepare STEM teachers primarily as content experts and then as experts in pedagogy.
  7. Most of the countries face challenges with teacher shortages on STEM subjects.
  8. None of the countries offer training in a structural way to teachers for teaching STEM in an interdisciplinary way.
  9. In most countries, there is no systematic training for in-service teachers considering STEM education.

Needs

  1. Set up STEM policies on national and EU level.
  2. Support development of interdisciplinary STEM education to promote
    competences and entrepreneurial skills.
  3. Prepare curricula that is breaking the boundaries between the disciplines and is competence oriented and linked to everyday problems.
  4. Teacher professional development in line with new societal changes (i.e.
    emphasis on inclusion, sustainable development).
  5. Bottom-up approach to identify teachers need in professional development and longer professional development courses.
  6. Develop exemplar STEM teaching materials.
  7. Prepare teachers to discuss ethical issues and uncertainties in STEM.
  8. Promote mobility of STEM teachers and exchange of training in STEM.

Policy Brief 1: Implementing European Priorities into Practice

Policy Brief 2: Supporting STEM Teachers

Fostering Excellence in STEM Education: An examination of Teacher Professional Development Needs

Needs in STEM Education: Highlighted challenges include time and resource constraints for teachers, professional development challenges, and difficulties in implementing integrated STEM education. Recommendations include leveraging intermediary networks for CPD, promoting interdisciplinary STEM education, and ensuring inclusive classroom environments.

Improving STEM Education: Addressing gender disparities, connecting STEM with real-life applications, changing perceptions about STEM, and staying updated on technological advancements emerged as critical strategies for enhancing STEM education effectively.

Enhancing STEM Training Courses: Findings underscored the importance of integrating AI in STEM teaching, incorporating entrepreneurship, and providing teachers with diverse materials and resources for effective training courses.

Success Factors for Online STEM Courses: Collaboration among teachers, content and material quality, integration of technology, effective assessment practices, and national-level training were identified as essential elements for successful online STEM courses.

Policy Brief 2: Supporting STEM Teachers

STEM education for the 21st century: Features, needs and support measures

Policy Brief 3: Enhancing STEM education through tested innovative professional learning formats

Policy Brief 3 focuses on enhancing STEM education in Europe through innovative professional learning formats developed by the ICSE Teacher Academy project. It highlights the importance of well-trained STEM educators for economic growth and innovation and addresses disparities in STEM teacher training across Europe. The brief presents our evidence-based approaches, namely Job Shadowing, our Summer Schools in Prague and Utrecht, and the European Workshop Series, which have been piloted to improve STEM teaching. Key findings indicate that interactive and contextually adaptable professional development formats are most effective. It also discusses challenges like language barriers and varying digital competencies and provides recommendations for scaling up these professional learning formats to ensure long-term impact.

Presentation of Results: Enhancing STEM Education

Policy Brief 3 Summary

Policy Brief 3: Enhancing STEM Education

Tested innovative professional learning formats

Case Studies

Introduction to the Case Studies

One of the objectives of the project is developing and testing effective, accessible and transferable models for professional learning of pre-service and in-service STEM teachers. The project (through WP4 led by the University of Malta) will evaluate the effectivity and accessibility of the professional learning activities as perceived by partners and by the participants in these sessions. The project involves peer-learning by job-shadowing, in which lecturers from one institution observe professional learning sessions such as lectures, organised by another institution. The project will also evaluate the peer learning through job shadowing and specifically the transferability of each activity to other contexts and other countries as analysed by partners.

This will help us evaluate the effectiveness, accessibility and transferability of strategies and programmes in different contexts. Furthermore, through the case studies we will obtain information about different models for professional learning and how these work in different contexts in order to inform policy makers.

The research questions are:

  • To what extent are the individual regional activities effective and accessible?
  • To what extent are the regional activities transferable to different contexts?

Based on the case studies carried out by the partners in the different countries, a cross-country analysis will lead to a report evaluating country measures across Europe from a multi-cultural European perspective. In this case the research question driving the analysis will be:

  • What are the characteristics of professional development activities and technologies and in which settings do they work best?

The strategy involved:

  1. A learning activity is chosen as the ‘case’ in the case study for a particular country.
  2. The learning activity is observed by two partners from other institutions.
  3. Reflections are written by the session provider. Feedback is provided by the observers and the participants.
  4. The learning activity is improved.
  5. The learning activity is adapted by a partner from another country.
  6. The learning activity is transferred to another institution.
  7. The partner carrying out the transfer will write a reflection.
  8. The partner offering the learning activity of the ‘case’ will analyse all the data and write the case study report.

In the evaluation a focus of interest is the teachers’ competence development, their motivation and the quality of the formats as perceived by teachers.

Cross-Country Analysis

The ICSE Academy project, spanning 13 European countries, conducted a comprehensive cross-country analysis on the effectiveness, accessibility, and transferability of professional development activities for STEM teachers. The study highlighted the importance of interactive, hands-on, and contextually relevant training methods. Key findings emphasized the need for adaptable content, collaborative learning, and the integration of digital tools. The project underscores the value of cross-border collaboration and tailored professional development to enhance STEM education across diverse educational contexts. Read the full report here:

Cross-Country Analysis

A report of the cross-country analysis and the conclusions drawn (D4.1)

Quantitative Research

Click the button below to load content by drive.google.com.

Load content

Report on Mobility and the European Dimension

We are happy to share the results from our comprehensive pre- post-study on Mobility conducted under the ICSE Teacher Academy project, which spans 13 European countries. This study focuses on the professional development needs of pre-service and in-service STEM teachers, assessing their motivation, attitudes towards international mobility, and the integration of European priorities such as sustainability, digitalization, and inclusive teaching in STEM education. For more detailed information and to find out about our key findings please click here:

Report on Mobility and the European Dimension

European Report on mobility and the European dimension (D5.1)
proSTEM is co-funded by the European Union under grant no. 101052670. Neither the European Union/European Commission nor the Granting Authority EACEA are responsible for the content; nor are they liable for any losses or damage resulting of the use of these websites and its published resources.

Do you have any questions?

LET'S GET IN TOUCH!

E-MailInstagramTwitterLinkedInFacebook
Menu